The Presumed Date of North Korea's Nuclear Attack

Previous interpretations of this quatrain were posted on www.CURRENTpredictions.org December, 2003 and http://currentpredictions,blogspot.com September 28, 2010.  The quatrain was updated July, 2016.

Century VIII, Quatrain 77:

The antichrist very soon annihilates the three, twenty seven years his war will last.  The unbelievers are dead, captive, exiled; with blood, human bodies, water and red hail covering the earth.

Interpretation with Explanatory Remarks:

Until recently I was under the impression that Nostradamus had not given us a specific date of North Korea’s nuclear attack, other than telling us the nuclear attack would take place shortly after the passing of the 2000 millennium (see century II, quatrain 46).

In previous interpretations of quatrains relating to North Korea I erroneously assumed that the attack would take place during Kim Jong Il’s lifetime.  My assumptions were wrong and totally unfounded.  Kim Jong Il did not possess neither the number of missiles, the missile delivery technology, nor the number of nuclear warheads in order to mount a devastating nuclear attack in the scale described by Nostradamus.  Due to the high level of secrecy in North Korea I had erroneously assumed that maybe North Korea was fully armed and ready.  After Kim Jong-un’s inauguration I realized that Nostradamus has also given us the date of the third antichrist’s nuclear attack. My suggestion to the readers of this quatrain is “Take a good look at both this quatrain and all the others related to North Korea.  Evaluate them.  Scrutinize them.  You be the judge.  Our lives and mankind’s existence depend on our conclusions.”

General Comments:

Kim Jong Il passed away in 2011.  Kim Jong-un was declared the supreme leader of North Korea immediately following the state funeral of his father on December 2011.

In this quatrain Nostradamus writes that the antichrist’s war will last twenty-seven years.  If the assumption that the antichrist refers to Kim Jong-un is correct and the 27^th year is the presumed date of his nuclear attack, then the projected date of the attack is circa December 2038.  The date is calculated by adding 27 years to 2011, the year he was declared supreme leader.

Note Nostradamus’ expression “…twenty-seven years his war will last.”  So far, this is a correct prediction.  Kim Jong-un has been on a war footing from the very first day he assumed power.  Since his very first day in power his primary objective has been to enhance North Korea’s missile and nuclear capability.  His constant stated objective has been the annihilation of his enemies.  The relevance of Nostradamus’ expression to what has actually been happening is awesome.  Nostradamus could not express the North Korean situation any better. 

There are several Nostradamus’ indicators that the third antichrist refers to Kim Jong-un.  Let us examine them:

• The expression “…twenty-seven years his war will last” so far applies to Kim Jong-un.

• The clearest and most persuasive indicator could be the word “his”.  In other words Nostradamus validates that North Korea’s situation is a one-sided war.  Nobody is fighting Kim Jong-un.  He is the one who is at war with all his perceived enemies.

•  Century II, quatrain 29 says “the man from the East will come out and strike everyone with his rod”.  This expression confirms that the third antichrist will come from the East.  North Korea is in the East.

•  Kim Jong-un, like his father, has avoided travelling outside his country in order to preclude the opportunity of someone overthrowing him.  See what Erika Cheetham wrote (century II, quatrain 29) in her book, The Prophecies of Nostradamus, 1986 edition, and I quote: “This is a curious verse.  The word sortira for ira indicates that the Easterner does not usually leave his country.”

• In century II, quatrain 30, Nostradamus describes the third antichrist as “A man who revives the infernal Gods of Hannibal, the terror of mankind.  Never more horror…”  Based on our experience of what Kim Jong-un’s character is, when he has amassed a multitude of nuclear warheads, wouldn’t he be capable of being the third antichrist?  His up-to-date behavior should leave no doubt.

• In century VI, quatrain 81 Nostradamus describes the third antichrist as follows: “…an inhuman cruel heart, black, and cold.”  Isn’t this description befitting Kim Jong-un based on his behavioral pattern up-to-date?

• In century V, quatrain 54 Nostradamus writes that the third antichrist would come from a country East of China.  The only country East of China that has a nuclear capability is North Korea.

In this quatrain Nostradamus predicted that the antichrist would “soon annihilate the three”, the three presumably being the current three superpowers, China, Russia, and the U.S.  This expression infers that Nostradamus had been aware that during our time period the world would have three superpowers.  This part of the prediction is also correct.

The question we need to raise at this time is “Is it feasible for North Korea to annihilate all three of the superpowers?”  What does Nostradamus infer with his prediction?  What is he really telling mankind?  I believe Nostradamus is implying North Korea could devastate all three superpowers with radioactive saturation.  See below:

·         By the year 2038 North Korea would have developed and improved both the missile delivery and nuclear technology, and it could have ample time to produce well over one hundred nuclear warheads.

·         In century II, quatrain 29, Nostradamus clearly tells us that the antichrist would employ his nuclear arsenal indiscriminately, basically like confetti, “…will strike everyone with his rod.”  Nostradamus’ prediction implies that even though North Korea’s military power may be asymmetrical to those of the three superpowers, he could annihilate them with radioactive contamination.  If North Korea were to explode a multitude of nuclear warheads at different parts of the planet, the wind and rain would carry the radioactivity to the rest of the planet.  Kim Jong-un would not even need to hit any of the superpowers with a direct hit.  He would simply saturate the atmosphere with radioactivity.  Could anyone imagine the pandemonium that would immediately ensue?

·         Nostradamus’ use of the words annihilate the three, under the afore-cited circumstances is a perfect description of what could actually happen.  Think of all the nuclear warheads Kim Jong-un could explode!  If a madman decides to employ a multitude of nuclear weapons indiscriminately, he could basically pollute the entire planet with radioactive contamination (see the expression “…covering the earth”).  The three superpowers may indeed have the most sophisticated weapon systems and powerful armies, but of what value would all their sophisticated weapon systems be if their respective countries have been contaminated by massive radioactivity blown in by wind and rain?

·         Normal countries like England, France, Israel, India, Pakistan, China, Russia, and the U.S. may have nuclear capability, but it is reasonable to assume that their respective governments would probably consent to use nuclear weapons only in a limited way, and under special circumstances. In the final analysis the real value of nuclear weapons is their deterrence factor. Each one of these countries has a national heritage and national legacy.  They don’t want to be destroyed in a nuclear mutual exchange.  North Korea has no national heritage or national legacy.  Furthermore, the North Korean government has no checks and balances.  North Korea is Kim Jong-un, nothing else counts.  Kim Jong-un does not even care about his own relatives.  He does not care about his own people.  Would he care about the rest of the world, especially if he knows that he has amassed a plethora of nuclear toys, enough to pollute the entire atmosphere?  An equally important concern is, “who would, within his government, dare to advise him otherwise, or prevent him from carrying out his order?”  His generals are scared to death of him.

The last line of this quatrain confirms that the leaders of the three superpowers would not take any preemptive action and the prediction of the third antichrist’ nuclear attack would be fulfilled.

The word “unbelievers” refers to those people that would not put any credence to Nostradamus’ prediction that Kim Jong-un would order a nuclear attack.

The word “captive” refers to the people who for one or another reason would not be able to relocate elsewhere, to a presumably radioactive-free area, and they would remain in their presumably contaminated environment.

The word “exiled” refers to people who would have the means to move/migrate to other areas.  The word “exiled” insinuates that they did not really want to move but had to move due to the prevailing circumstances.

Nostradamus’ expression “…human bodies, water… covering the earth” is interpreted as follows:  After such widespread catastrophic devastation we could reasonably assume that several areas of the planet would remain highly radioactive and uninhabited for several decades, probably centuries.  Those areas would remain untouched, including the bodies of the perished.  They would be in a “no man’s land.”  Furthermore, Nostradamus insinuates that “sometime” following North Korea’s nuclear attack the sea level would rise and the dead bodies would remain scattered around the planet at the low elevation lands which would gradually be submerged.  In other words Nostradamus ties in the North Korean nuclear attack with climate change and the ensuing rise of the sea level.  I believe the description he portrays in this quatrain is not an instantaneous picture of how the planet would look like at an instant, but a description of how the planet would look like over many years, probably over many decades.

The words “red hail” cannot be interpreted.  It could be something relating to the aftermath of the nuclear explosions.  Nostradamus could be referring to radioactive debris, or he could possibly be referring to ground areas that received contaminated rainfall particles which would become “hot spots”.

Large-Scale Migration

This quatrain was interpreted February, 2008. It was updated in June, 2016.  

Century II, Quatrain 95:

The populated lands will become uninhabitable, great disagreement in order to obtain lands.  Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence.  Then for the great brothers, death and dissension.

Interpretation with Explanatory Remarks:

The inference of this quatrain is that as a result of either widespread radioactive contamination, destructive civil strife, or serious climate change, some populated countries (lands) would become uninhabitable, as its people endeavor to relocate to other countries. 

In this quatrain Nostradamus tells us that as these refugees would embark in mass migrations to relocate elsewhere, they would encounter problems in being accepted (see Nostradamus’ words “great disagreement in order to obtain lands).  In other words, Nostradamus is clearly telling us that these refugees would not be readily accepted by other countries.

What does Nostradamus’ word disagreement connote?  The Cambridge English Dictionary defines this word as “a situation in which people have different opinions or an inability to agree”.  Isn’t this exactly what we are currently witnessing – almost on a daily basis – as these huge groups of refugees endeavor to relocate, primarily to several European countries?  Don’t we constantly hear and read on news media that politicians and various countries express a variety of arguments as to whether to accept them or not to accept them?  Isn’t this precisely what Nostradamus predicted?

Nostradamus is also telling us that these refugees would come from different countries and they would endeavor to relocate in different countries.  This part of the prediction is also correct. 

What about Nostradamus’ expression “…great disagreement?”  Wouldn’t the qualifying word “great” relate to our fear that maybe some of these refugees could be, or become, terrorists who could endanger our lives?  Fear would definitely be a genuine concern that would justify Nostradamus’ wording.  Think about it.  You be the judge.

The latter part of the quatrain refers to Nostradamus’ expression “Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence.  Then for the great brothers, death and dissension”.  The sequential breakdown of this prediction is as follows:

• The words “great brothers” refer to the Kennedy brothers.  The words “great brothers” are a metaphorical symbolism of America. 

• If my interpretation is correct, Nostradamus predicted that the American voters would elect someone who would be incapable of prudence.  Nostradamus’ expression “Kingdoms given to men …” refers to the outcome of the November Presidential elections; and

• Following the November 2016 Presidential elections America would experience a violent social uprising and bloodshed.  A violent social uprising and ensuing bloodshed is also referenced in century X, quatrain 81.

General Comments:

In 2015 and 2016 we have experienced a mass migration of refugees from several countries inflicted by protracted domestic civil strives.  We have also experienced the reluctance and concerns with which many politicians in Western countries approved the settlement of refugees in their respective countries.  

Nostradamus’ reference to “disagreement” relating to the acceptance of refugees in various countries is correct.  We can readily recognize that under the ongoing geopolitical concerns and frequent reports of terrorist activities, any politician’s decision-making process to approve the relocation of so many refugees would be problematic, and reaching an acceptable pluralistic consensus would not necessarily be that readily achievable or acceptable to the local populations.

From a chronological viewpoint the mass migration of refugees and the November 2016 U.S. Presidential elections coincide (see reference to “Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence”).

Could Nostradamus’ wording “Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence” refer to the political discourse relating to the 2016 Presidential State primaries?    Wow!  What a noteworthy observation, especially coming from a man who lived centuries ago!  Nostradamus sounds like Mitt Romney! 

Haven’t many Republican politicians perceived Donald Trump precisely as incapable of prudence?  What about Hillary Clinton?  Is she prudent and capable of running the country and solving America’s most crucial problems – unemployment, job migration to other countries, and income inequality?  Her husband, Bill Clinton, approved NAFTA, which was instrumental in the wholesale migration of America’s industries to other countries and he is deemed responsible for the current demise of the American working class.  Hillary, until very recently, supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed agreement which would erode the American job market even further.  Do NAFTA and TPP qualify Hillary Clinton to be the next President of the U.S., and is her position prudent?  I never heard her criticize Bill Clinton’s NAFTA approval.  In fact, she stated that she intends to assign Bill Clinton with the task to resolve the country’s economic problems.  Does this mean she intends to get rid of the remaining few jobs in this country?  

The word “Then …” infers that the dissension and loss of life would take place after the U.S. Presidential elections.  The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the word “dissension” as: Disagreement that causes the people in a group to argue about something that is important to them.  This is an ominous prediction.  The fact that Nostradamus included this event of death and dissension in his book of predictions infers that this could be a rather serious event of street violence and death.  Such an event could create spontaneous outbreaks of civil unrest and violence, bring about chaos and social disorder around the country, undermine the control of public institutions, adversely impact the economy, and seriously impact America’s image around the world.

The latter part of the quatrain referring to dissension and death may already be unfolding in front of our eyes, and it may have become apparent during the 2016 Presidential State primaries.  Look at the reaction of the American electorate vis-à-vis the established politicians?  Look at the enthusiastic reception Trump has received!  Look at the equally enthusiastic support Senator Bernie Sanders has received!  What does the people’s reaction tell us?  Doesn’t it show anger and disgust for the political establishment?

The results of the 2016 State primaries reflect a defining moment, a complete revulsion to political cronyism and corruption.  Does anyone think this awareness of political injustice will stop with the final Presidential nominations?  I don’t think so.  The world economies are gradually but surely deteriorating.  All indications point to a protracted economic secular stagnation with quarterly GDPs around 1%.  The massive jobs migration from the U.S. to other countries will, most likely, continue unabated.  Private equity funds will continue to increase in number and in asset allocations.  Income inequality between the very rich and the 99% of the population will continue to increase.  The national deficit has already reached about $19.5 trillion.  How much higher could it go without triggering a massive inflation – especially if interest rates are raised and the federal government’s portion to service the national debt increases to an untenable level?  At some point in time people’s despair and anger will seek a violent release.  In the near future we will find out if Nostradamus’ prediction has fully materialized.

The Downfall of Asia

This quatrain was interpreted and posted on http://currentpredictions.blogspot.com/ on August 2007. My previous interpretation is currently being corrected and updated.

Century IV, Quatrain 50:  Libra will be seen to reign in the West, holding the rule over the skies and earth.  No one will see the strength of Asia destroyed until seven hold the hierarchy in succession.

Interpretation with Explanatory Remarks: 

This could be an extremely important prediction.  It relates to current ongoing economic events in Asia, and particularly in China. 

In the 1986 edition of her book, The Prophecies of Nostradamus, Erika Cheetham wrote: According to this prediction, when Libra the Balance rules over America, that country will be at the height of its powers.  But Asian strength will be equally strong until the seventh comes.  Does this mean the seventh ruler in Asia, or the seventh decade?” 

In 1986 this prediction was not fully understood, but it should be more meaningful after September 17, 2015, the day the Federal Reserve Bank announced to the world that they will keep the key interest rate at zero, citing global turmoil.  (Nostradamus may be confirming that the Federal Reserve made the right decision because China’s economic health may be in a much worse condition than we realize.) 

This quatrain is somewhat self-explanatory.  Salient points of what Nostradamus is telling us are discussed below.

General Comment:   

Nostradamus gives us several important pieces of information.  Chronologically and factually, they relate to China’s current socio-economic problems. 

First: Nostradamus tells us “Libra will be seen to reign in the West, holding the rule over the skies and earth.”  “Libra” is an astrological sign and it stands for balance.  This expression appears to refer to America’s military and technological strength.  Note his words “…over skies and earth.”  Obviously, Nostradamus recognized the value of “air power”.  This is indeed a very interesting observation coming from a psychic who lived about 450 years ago when airplanes did not exist. 

Second: Nostradamus refers to the economic status of several Asian countries collectively as the strength of Asia, but he actually focuses on China, and he makes this known through his reference to the line of succession. This is a relevant and correct observation. For several years South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan were referred to as the Four Asian Tigers or Asian Dragons.  In fact, a few years ago these Asian economic powerhouses together with China considered decoupling from the dollar as an exchange/reserve currency replacing it by an “Asian basket of currencies”.  In the 1980s Japan’s economy was another economic powerhouse, but its economy has been in a deflationary state ever since.  Japan’s economy has recently deteriorated to the point a few days ago Moody’s downgraded Japan from AA to A+.

Third: Nostradamus tells us “No one will see the strength of Asia destroyed until seven hold the hierarchy in succession.”  In this sentence Nostradamus refers to China’s line of succession.  The seventh President of the People’s Republic of China was Hu Jintao (2003-2013, see line of succession below).  This sentence implies that until the end of Hu Jintao’s Presidency, Asia’s economic strength would be perceived as strong.  This is indeed a correct observation.  The extent and seriousness of China’s socio-economic problems surfaced during Xi Jinping’s Presidency.

Fourth: The wording “No one will see the strength of Asia destroyed until seven hold the hierarchy in succession” infers that the structural socio-economic problems which surfaced during Xi Jinping’s Presidency were festering during Hu Jintao’s Presidency, and prior.  Indeed, during Xi Jinping’s Precidency China’s economy started to weaken.  An unexpected decline of exports, lower GDP growth rates, and increased unemployment during Xi Jinping’s Precidency exacerbated the problems of the pre-existing economic structure to the point that China’s economic future is currently in question.  The amazing thing is that Nostradamus’ prediction appears to be relevant to today’s concerns.

Fifth: The most noteworthy point Nostradamus makes is the use of the word “destroyed”.  He comes out like a modern economic forecaster and declares that the strength of Asia will be destroyed.  Wow!  His expression sounds emphatic, as if there is absolutely no doubt about the outcome of what is to come. Does this mean that China’s economy could have a hard landing?  Does it mean that following the current decline of exports/imports and overall economic deterioration, there could be other variables that could come into play and worsen China’s economy even more?  Whatever the reasons may be, his prediction sounds ominous – not only for China but for the entire world economy. 

Sixth: We all know that present day economies are intertwined and interdependent – especially China’s.  If China’s economy has a hard landing or the country experiences serious economic problems, other Asian economies, emerging markets, as well as Western economies would also be affected one way or another and in various degrees.  Isn’t it precisely this type of concern that may have prompted the Federal Reserve Bank to announce on September 17, 2015 that they will not have a rate hike?

Seventh. This quatrain consists of two sentences.  The second sentence refers to the destruction of Asian strength.  The first sentence refers to “Libra will be seen to reign in the West, holding the rule over the skies and earth.”  If we look at the quatrain we see no obvious logical cohesion between these two sentences.  What relevance does the West’s military strength have to do with Asia’s economic decline? Ostensibly none.  But, could Nostradamus be inferring that China’s economic destruction would also adversely impact Western economies?  Could Nostradamus be inferring that at the time of China’s economic collapse, America’s military power would be at its peak, but following China’s economic collapse America’s military power would decline?  Isn’t it a well known axiom that military power is dependent on economic power?  Therefore, is Nostradamus telling us that the economic decline which would start with China would have a domino effect throughout the rest of the world economies?  Could Nostradamus be inferring that we are about to have a world depression?  Aren’t most of the economies currently being supported by constant infusion of artificial steroids, the so-called Quantitative Easing (QE) from Central Banks? How much of a push would it take to bring these houses of cards down?  You be the judge.

China’s line of succession Nostradamus refers to:

The line of succession cited below relates to succession of Premiers (the National President of China):

     #1  Maozedong , 1st premier of Communist gov’t, 1949;
     #2  Liu Shaoqi ,1959;

     #3 Hua Guofeng, 1976. (He was later considered "no good" because of his involvement in the Cultural Revolution, and he was often omitted in the list);
     #4 Li Xiannian, 1983;
     #5 Yang Shangkun, 1988;
     #6 Jiang Zemin, 1993;
     #7 Hu Jintao, 2003. 

     #8. Xi Jinping

There is also another list which refers to the head of the Communist Party, the Secretary of the Party. Mao served in both positions, but Dong Xiaping was in charge for many years and brought capitalism to China. He wasn't on the list for President/Premier, but rather the Party Secretary (a more important position).

Nostradamus and the Apocalypse/Second Coming

I started interpreting Nostradamus’ predictions in 2003.  This is also the date of my first posting of Nostradamus’ interpretations on the Internet.  My first website is www.CurrentPredictions.org.  I mention the date because this is a critical timing benchmark which I will explain in detail in the future.

It is reasonable to assume that some readers may view my interpretations of a psychic with skepticism.  In the case of Nostradamus, I am, indeed, fully aware that it is difficult for the human mind to accept that a psychic could foresee precise events several centuries ahead of his time.  However, my initial suspicions about Nostradamus proved correct and beyond any expectations.

Nostradamus wrote nine hundred and forty one predictions in the form of four-line poems, referred to as quatrains.  Out of all these predictions, there is no doubt that a percentage of them were wrong.  Other predictions were not properly interpreted because of the convoluted way in which they were purposely written.  This category includes some of my interpretations.  However, what is unquestionably astonishing is the fact that Nostradamus predicted current unfolding events several centuries in advance with the precision of a neurosurgeon.  This is an indisputable fact.  For skeptics, atheists, and unbelievers the acid test is Nostradamus’ two predictions on Iran and Osama bin Laden.

A noteworthy observation that needs to be pointed out is the fact that Nostradamus’ predictions are, unquestionably, considerably more critical and important to our generation than the majority of his other, past, predictions, which are relatively trivial in comparison.  It is important however to recognize that even though predictions that apply to past events may be deemed trivial or less important to our generation, they have played a very important and critical role in establishing Nostradamus’ past credibility.  The noteworthy point and critical distinction I would like to make is that for our generation, Nostradamus’ existence may transcend the role of merely being a good psychic.  His true role in life may have been that of a divinely-inspired prophet. His raison d'être may be the fulfillment of The New Testament.  Let me please explain.

Previous Nostradamus interpreters and commentators viewed him as a typical psychic who dealt with common everyday-type predictions.  I believe he was more than a typical psychic.  I believe Nostradamus was a divine messenger, just like the prophets of the Old Testament, and that he is the link to The New Testament’s reference of the Apocalypse/Second Coming.

The document titled Witnesses of the Apocalypse and of the Second Coming, posted on this Website in 12/7/2008 explains how Nostradamus brought about the Apocalypse and what mankind needs to do to save itself during the unfolding changes of our planet.  This is a message from a God-loving man who lived his entire life during an oppressive theocracy and under constant fear of being burned alive at the stake.

As noted above, the majority of his past predictions dealt with relatively common events.  However, the predictions that relate to our generation addressed current evolving geopolitical events and conditions which could impact the very existence of our planet and mankind’s survival. This is a critical distinction.

Predictions referring to current unfolding events described the melting of icebergs, the submergence of habitable lands, climate and weather changes, the adverse impact of the ecosystems’ changes on food productivity, and the ensuing world-wide famine.  In addition, he described the nuclear mushroom and the adverse effects of radioactive rain on human health and agricultural productivity, and covered extensively the North Korean nuclear threat.  He predicted Osama bin Laden and the dire Middle East situation.  He described, in ultimate detail, the current evolving events with Iran.  He had such phenomenal psychic abilities that he even foresaw the critical social issue of income inequality we are faced with, and society’s extraordinary lust for money.  He went as far as to rebuke us that money has become our God!  His psychic abilities were amazing, awesome.  Indeed, they were incredible!

 

Obviously, all these predictions dealing with our current ongoing events could not be trivial psychic predictions.  I believe Nostradamus was conveying to mankind a divine message.  He was conveying a heads-up warning of what is to come.  He wanted mankind to become aware of the dire upcoming world-wide events and potentially cataclysmic changes.  He wanted mankind to become aware of the existential threats that could threaten our existence and adversely impact the quality of life. 

Iran

This quatrain was interpreted on December 2003.  It is being revisited.

Century I, Quatrain 70:
Rain, famine and war will not cease in Persia; too great a faith will betray the monarch.  Those (actions) started in France will end there, a secret sign for one to be sparing.

Interpretation with Explanatory Remarks:

The first interpretation of this quatrain was posted on www.currentpredictions.org in 2003. This posting includes refinements and two related predictions previously left out. 

Chronologically, this prediction starts with the overthrow of the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, by the Islamic Revolution of Iran of 1979.

Nostradamus’ prediction “too great a faith will betray the monarch” refers to the powerful religious movement that toppled the Shah. 

It should be noted that the Shah was the only monarch in modern Persian/Iranian history.  Hence, Nostradamus’ wording “…will betray the monarch” is relevant and correct.

Following the Shah’s overthrow and departure into exile, the Grand Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the Islamic revolution, who until then lived in exile in France, returned to Iran as the Supreme Leader of the new government.  Nostradamus’ description “Those (actions) started in France…” is correct and relevant to this prediction. 

The above part of the quatrain which relates to the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran has been fulfilled precisely as described by Nostradamus. The rest of the prediction probably applies to the period starting with the revolution in 1979, and covers an undetermined time into the future.  If Nostradamus is equally correct about the bleak future he describes for Iran, as he was in the first part of his prediction, both the Middle East, as well as the rest of the world, would be confronted with grim and far-reaching geopolitical problems.      

 
The rest of the quatrain which has not been addressed in this section will be interpreted under General Comments together with two other complementary quatrains.

General Comments:  

• Unquestionably, the implications of Nostradamus’ prediction are bound to have a profound impact on the geopolitical stability of the Middle East and beyond its geographic borders.  Therefore, the potential merits and validity of what Nostradamus predicted will be evaluated and scrutinized on the basis of historical data, current ongoing experiences and observations, Iran’s geopolitical aspirations, and behavioral patterns of the Middle East protagonists (the Shiites and Sunnis) since 1979.  Future potential outcomes will be extrapolated.

 

• As noted above, Nostradamus’ expression “Rain, famine and war will not cease in Persia” covers the period starting circa 1979 to an undetermined time into the future.

 

• With few words Nostradamus portrays a very dire and dangerous situation about Iran, expected to last many years into the future.  His phraseology sounds both as a supplication and as a warning to mankind to try to steer away from this impending calamity.  His message is very clear.  In fact, his message could not be stated any clearer.  But, what is he telling us and why is his message of such utmost importance?

 

• In brief, he is telling us that Iran will be involved in constant warfare, and its people will suffer from continuous famine.  But, his most critical prediction relevant to the ongoing Iranian nuclear situation is his cryptic expression that the famine and war will be associated with “rain”, a word, which in Nostradamus’ lingo, infers radioactive rain.  The wording of his expression infers that he was fully aware of the current ongoing situation in the Middle East.  Could his prediction be correct, and if so, why?  But, before I proceed to the analysis, I would like to delve into Nostradamus’ references to milk and rain, and why these two words are so relevant and important to this prediction.

 

• Century II, quatrain 46 posted on www.Currentpredictions.org back in 2003 refers to rain and milk.  In this particular quatrain he associates milk and rain with blood, disease, and famine.  The word milk infers a nuclear mushroom.  The word rain infers radioactive rain and he associates it with sickness, blood, and famine.  Indeed, radioactivity can sicken and kill people; and, it can also bring about famine because agricultural products grown on contaminated land are not edible.  Obviously, Nostradamus did not only have the ability to see things many years into the future, but he could also assess their ramifications beyond the visual plane. Note however that in century I, quatrain 70, which refers to Persia/Iran, Nostradamus does not refer to milk.  In this quatrain he only refers to rain.  This difference may be very important.  It will be explained later on.  But this difference could be one more reason why Nostradamus’ prediction may merit our utmost attention.  Now I will proceed to the analysis to determine “Why Nostradamus may be right in his prediction”.    

Historical Perspective:

      

History tells us that in the past Iran and its many Arab neighboring countries have been involved in constant religious conflicts.  The hostility has been mutual. The spiritual divide between the Sunnis and Shiites is too deep and irreconcilable.  The constant antagonistic dissension for regional religious dominance transcends secular logic and national interests.  Religious fanaticism has been a blinding force that defies logic. 

 

       Status Since 1979:

 

1. From 1980 through 1988 Iran has been involved in a prolonged, destructive, military conflict with Iraq.  During this entire period the Iranian people did suffer considerably.

2. Considering the fact that following the Iranian Islamic Revolution the regime is tightly controlled by Ayatollahs, one could reasonably assume that the potential for future conflicts could increase exponentially.  Iranian national interests are bound to become subordinate to religious beliefs and spiritual aspirations.  The indiscriminate massacre of thousands of innocent civilians in Syria is proof that the Ayatollahs are willing to employ ruthless force in order to attain their goals.  In fact, during the Iranian green revolution, the regime did not hesitate to massacre its own people in order to stay in power.  If the Ayatollahs have demonstrated such cruelty at this time, how would they behave in the future, if they had weapons of mass destruction? 

     

2. For several years Iran has persistently supported the Hezbollah organization in Lebanon, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad Shiite regime, the Palestinian Hamas, and the Iraqi Shiites.  Iran’s actions destabilized Lebanon, and indirectly, through proxies, brought about serious socioeconomic cleavages in adjacent Sunni countries.  The massive Syrian diaspora to other Sunni countries has exacerbated their socioeconomic conditions even more, and destabilized their regimes.  The impact of the Syrian refugee tsunami will be felt for many decades to come. The most critical lasting effect of the current ongoing conflicts may be the radicalization it created among Sunnis and the potential for future retribution.   

4. All these current ongoing conflicts and bloodshed have increased religious tensions and the desire for revenge against the Shiite regime.  Peace and amicable relations among countries rely on trust and on a workable balance of power.  In the Middle East, trust is non-existent.  Furthermore, the balance of power could change dramatically in favor of Iran, no matter what the outcome of the nuclear negotiations is.  If Iran is permitted to weaponize its nuclear material, they will de facto become a super-nuclear threat not only to the Sunnis and Israel but potentially to the entire world.  Religious fanatics cannot be trusted.  On the other hand, if Iran is allowed to retain their current nuclear energy program, even as a peaceful program, Iran would still tip the scales of the regional balance of power. 

5. Whether we want to admit it or not, Iran currently has the finest governing operations of all the countries in the entire Middle East, including Israel.  The obvious success of their programs demonstrates that they have well-identified and defined strategic objectives.  Their plans are obviously managed by highly competent personnel. Their actions demonstrate that they are following well prepared plans that cover all potential options and outcomes.  Their actions demonstrate that their plans are pragmatic with specific short-term and long-term objectives.  Their actions clearly demonstrate that they are determined to achieve their objectives at any cost. They are cunning, they are realistic, they are outstanding administrators, and they seem to follow a well-defined national strategy.  Therefore, their future success is assured – even with a nuclear energy program.  On the other hand, we see a bunch of decadent Sunni administrations, governing on a day-to-day basis, wasting their national revenue on non-essential programs, reacting to events rather than pursuing a meaningful and constructive long-term plan and national strategy.  They don’t seem to be cognizant that one of these days there will be no more oil to pump out of the ground.  In the case of Israel, we see nothing more than sclerotic administrations mired in an anachronistic national defense concept.  Their paramount national strategic objective seems to be the perpetual construction of “Israeli settlements”.  Israel’s behavioral pattern clearly demonstrates that the governing administrations are not even aware of what their true national interests are.  

6. In brief, the change in the balance of power in favor of Iran could take place for the following reasons: 

1. Nuclear power plants will enable Iran to meet the country’s future electric demand in a cost-effective and efficient manner. Relatively cheap electric power will enable Iran to expand and modernize its manufacturing and industrial base, including its defense industry.  On the contrary, neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia which currently rely on oil/gas to power electric plants will continue to allocate valuable and scarce oil/gas resources to meet electric demand.  Eventually, this could end up as a very costly and wasteful process.  As oil/gas reserves of Sunni countries are depleted – and oil/gas is still the main source of revenue to Sunni countries – the lack of nuclear energy plants could become a serious economic and national defense liability.  All indications point to the fact that time is on the side of Iran. 

2. As Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves deplete, its oil revenues will be hard pressed to support both the country’s many domestic social programs and its defense budget. Military strength is based on economic strength.  Any future reduction in oil revenue is bound to result in serious social unrest.  In fact, depletion of oil resources is bound to impact dramatically the socioeconomic and defense posture of all Sunni countries.  What have the Sunni countries done to prepare for a future without oil?  In turn, this will affect the regional balance of power. 

3. The demographics within Israel are projected to change in favor of the Palestinians.  This is bound to bring about further domestic instability and national insecurity within Israel, which Iran could try to take advantage of.  Even if Iran did not have nuclear weapons, it would have more advanced rockets, missiles, and probably other types of weapons of mass destruction.  The point I like to make is that the “good old days” when young Palestinians threw stones at Israelis, are gone.  The stones and slings have been replaced with sophisticated rockets and missiles that could reach Israeli cities effortlessly.  Iran does not necessarily need to be a nuclear power to threaten Israel or its immediate Sunni neighbors.  A non-nuclear Iran, with a highly sophisticated technical knowhow and a well-managed defense infrastructure, could still pose a serious threat to its immediate neighbors.  The world will soon witness this transformative metamorphosis the moment the economic sanctions imposed on Iran during the last few years are retracted.  Iran’s industrial infrastructure will blossom into an amazing killing machine.             

4. The U.S. budget deficit is increasing every year.  At some point in the future the fiscal budgets are bound to be cut dramatically in order to partially balance the budget.  Economic weakness is bound to affect U.S. influence in foreign countries.  Foreign aid and military assistance to countries like Jordan, Israel, and Egypt would either be reduced or discontinued.  When this happens, recipient countries will feel the impact in different ways.  Iran could take advantage of the opportunity to exert its influence in a way that could increase regional instability and result in a new round of local conflicts. 

7. Even if Iran currently agrees to a peaceful nuclear program, we don’t know if at some point in the future Iran would renege on its agreement and surreptitiously attempt to weaponize its nuclear material.  If this were to happen, the assumption is that Iran’s nuclear facilities would be hit by conventional weapons and bunker busters.   Such an attack could result in an accidental radioactive release in the environment.  This may be the reason why Nostradamus predicted radioactive rain but no nuclear mushroom. 

8. Any future military engagements with Iran are bound to have world-wide economic impact because of potential oil disruptions.  Depending on the scope and extent of the conflicts, oil prices could skyrocket.  Weak economies dependent on imported oil would be affected most.  For some countries such an event could be calamitous.  As time goes by, militarily, Iran will be in a better posture to withstand air attacks against its underground nuclear sites.  Air attacks will undoubtedly damage many of these nuclear facilities, and could destroy some altogether, but Iran would still retain the technological knowledge and enough nuclear material for a new restart.

9. The long-term success of any Iranian nuclear agreements depends on the existence and qualitative attributes of a credible U.S. coherent foreign strategy vis-à-vis the Middle East.  Currently, such a strategy, or doctrine, is non-existent.  Our strategy and doctrine appear to be redefined daily. 

10. As long as Israel continues to behave irresponsibly, Israel will continue to destabilize the security of the Middle East and foment the flames for new conflicts.  The time for a peaceful rapprochement with the Palestinians is running out.     

      Related Quatrains: 

The last sentence of century I, quatrain 70, states “Those (actions) started in France will end there, a secret sign for one to be sparing.”  I believe this cryptic remark relates to another prediction, century II, quatrain 2, which cites:

The blue leader will inflict upon the white leader as much damage as France has done them good.  Death from the great antenna hanging from the branch, when the king will ask how many of his men have been captured.”

 

I cannot fully interpret the scenario of this prediction, but I believe Nostradamus is telling us that at some point in the future Iran will attack France – presumably with nuclear weapons.  The expression “blue leader” refers to the Iranians.  Nostradamus’ remark “ …as France has done them good” refers to the fact that France had permitted Ayatollah Khomeini to reside in France during his exile.

The other quatrain related to Iran is century V, quatrain 86.  This quatrain was posted on currentpredictions.blogspot.com/ on April 2004.  The timing of this prediction relates to when the sea level will be rising, several/many years into the future.  The relevant point is that Iran will be powerful enough to exert pressure on neighboring countries like Turkey.  This should tell us something.  

Summary:

We need to realize that Nostradamus’ prediction does not apply just to the immediate future but to several decades into the future.  With this in mind, we need to recognize that any nuclear agreements negotiated in 2013 or 2014, may no longer be valid twenty or thirty years later because other factors may have radically altered the regional balance of power. Examples: depletion of Saudi Arabian oil, lower oil prices, an economic depression or a fiscal crisis in the US, etc.  In brief, the Middle East could face various potential catalysts, internal or external, that could gradually or abruptly change the political dynamics of the region.  One thing is certain.  The introduction of nuclear technology, regardless whether it is weaponized or not, is bound to eventually tip the scales in favor of Iran.  Therefore, the propensity for future conflicts in the Middle East will rise, no matter how successful the current United Nations nuclear negotiations prove to be. 

Readers of this website should realize that not all predictions are absolute.  Not all events are predetermined.  "Free will" invariably always plays an important role in our decision-making process that could alter the course of events.  In fact, the reason why Nostradamus may have published these predictions may have been to alert mankind of the evils awaiting mankind unless our leaders sober up and act with more diligence, seriousness, and tolerance.  Going to war is a serious decision, a very serious decision.  Peoples’ lives are at stake – many of them innocent bystanders, what we casually refer to as “collateral damage”.  Furthermore, there is always the possibility of a pyrrhic outcome or serious unintended consequences.  People should stop thinking of “victory”.  Let’s start talking and thinking about “the cost” – the cost to our national treasury, the cost to innocent participants that could lose their lives, ruin their health, and the psychological devastation to military retirees.  Maybe this is what Nostradamus is so desperately trying to tell us.   So, as you ponder his prediction, evaluating and scrutinizing the facts and/or arguments presented herein, also think of "free will" and its potential implications.  

 

Mabus – Mahmoud Abbas Revisited
This quatrain was interpreted before.  This is a revisit.

Century II, Quatrain 62:
Mabus will then soon die and there will come a dreadful destruction of people and animals.  Suddenly vengeance will be revealed, a hundred hands, thirst and hunger, when the comet will pass.

Interpretation with Explanatory Remarks:
Interpretaions of this quatrain were posted on www.currentpredictions.blogspot.com/ on August 1, 2010 and December 4, 2012.  This posting includes corrections and refinements.

Details of the prediction are cited below.

General Comments:

• In the previous postings of this quatrain it was noted that the anagram “Mabus” used by Nostradamus probably refers to Mahmoud Abbas.

 

• In this quatrain Nostradamus is employing a causative expression (from the French words alors mourra) to tell us that Mahmoud Abbas will then die.  This expression implies that Mahmoud Abbas will “die as a result of something happening to him”.

 

• Nostradamus does not tell us what is the precise cause of Mahmoud Abbas’ death, but in the same sentence he tells us that a dreadful destruction of both people and animals will ensue. 

 

• The wording “dreadful destruction of people and animals” clearly describes the results of a chemical and/or biological attack. Nostradamus may imply that Mahmoud Abbas is one of the many victims.   

 

• If my assumption is correct that the anagram “Mabus” stands for Mahmoud Abbas, then Nostradamus is also giving us the place where this attack would take place.  Mahmoud Abbas lives in the Palestinian area, adjacent to Israeli territory.  Any chemical/biological attack against Israel is bound to also affect Palestinians.  Therefore, Nostradamus implies that Israel and adjacent Palestinian areas will experience a dreadful chemical and/or biological attack.

 

• The word dreadful may imply that the attack will be a lot more serious than what we have recently experienced in Syria. The only remaining question is the timing of this attack, and he is giving us this information in his very last sentence of the quatrain.  

 

• The last sentence tells us that this event will transpire after the passing of the comet.  Recent NASA postings on the Internet refer to a newly discovered comet, ISON, which is expected to enter the solar system the latter part of November 2013.  Nostradamus tells us that the attack would transpire after the passing of this comet.  

Nostradamus’ timing of the attack is very intriguing.  He is basically telling us that the attack would take place in 2014.  Nostradamus’s timing coincides with the last window of opportunity Israel has to attack Iran’s nuclear sites in order to delay their nuclear program.  During his recent visit to the United States in October 2013, Prime Minister Netanyahu repeatedly stated that a pre-emptive strike against the Iranian nuclear sites is mandatory, and the next few months is the last window of opportunity Israel will have to do so.  He also emphasized that Iran’s nuclear facilities are capable of producing fissile material for as many as two hundred nuclear warheads, not just one or two.  Nostradamus’ prediction has profound implications.  A peaceful resolution of the Iranian nuclear impasse appears to be unattainable.  To Israel, a nuclear Iran is an existential threat to its very existence.  In parallel, a nuclear Iran is an existential need for the Shiite theocracy and its dominance in the Muslim world. 

Nostradamus’ warning is relevant to the turbulent, violent, and unpredictable current events in the Middle East.  In view of the ongoing events in Syria, Iran’s efforts to develop a nuclear program, and Israel’s declaration that they will not allow Iran to become a nuclear power, Nostradamus’ warning merits special attention.  Furthermore, what renders this prediction worthy of our attention is the fact that Nostradamus associates the attack with weapons of mass destruction that can affect both people and animals. Syria has already employed these weapons of mass destruction.