This quatrain was interpreted February, 2008. It was updated
in June, 2016.
Century II, Quatrain 95:
The populated lands will become uninhabitable, great
disagreement in order to obtain lands.
Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence. Then for the great brothers, death and dissension.
Interpretation with
Explanatory Remarks:
The inference of this quatrain is that as a result of either
widespread radioactive contamination, destructive civil strife, or serious
climate change, some populated countries (lands) would become uninhabitable, as
its people endeavor to relocate to other countries.
In this quatrain Nostradamus tells us that as these refugees
would embark in mass migrations to relocate elsewhere, they would encounter
problems in being accepted (see Nostradamus’ words “great disagreement in order
to obtain lands). In other words,
Nostradamus is clearly telling us that these refugees would not be readily
accepted by other countries.
What does Nostradamus’ word disagreement connote? The
Cambridge English Dictionary defines this word as “a situation in which people
have different opinions or an inability to agree”. Isn’t this exactly what we are currently
witnessing – almost on a daily basis – as these huge groups of refugees
endeavor to relocate, primarily to several European countries? Don’t we constantly hear and read on news
media that politicians and various countries express a variety of arguments as
to whether to accept them or not to accept them? Isn’t this precisely what Nostradamus
predicted?
Nostradamus is also telling us that these refugees would
come from different countries and they would endeavor to relocate in different
countries. This part of the prediction
is also correct.
What about Nostradamus’ expression “…great
disagreement?” Wouldn’t the qualifying
word “great” relate to our fear that maybe some of these refugees could be, or
become, terrorists who could endanger our lives? Fear would definitely be a genuine concern
that would justify Nostradamus’ wording.
Think about it. You be the judge.
The latter part of the quatrain refers to Nostradamus’
expression “Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence. Then for the great brothers, death and
dissension”. The sequential breakdown of this prediction is
as follows:
- The words “great brothers” refer to the Kennedy
brothers. The words “great
brothers” are a metaphorical symbolism of
- If my interpretation is correct, Nostradamus predicted that the American voters would elect someone who would be incapable of prudence. Nostradamus’ expression “Kingdoms given to men …” refers to the outcome of the November Presidential elections; and
- Following
the November 2016 Presidential elections
General Comments:
In 2015 and 2016 we have experienced a mass migration of
refugees from several countries inflicted by protracted domestic civil strives. We have also experienced the reluctance and
concerns with which many politicians in Western countries approved the
settlement of refugees in their respective countries.
Nostradamus’ reference to “disagreement” relating to the
acceptance of refugees in various countries is correct. We can readily recognize that under the
ongoing geopolitical concerns and frequent reports of terrorist activities, any
politician’s decision-making process to approve the relocation of so many
refugees would be problematic, and reaching an acceptable pluralistic consensus
would not necessarily be that readily achievable or acceptable to the local populations.
From a chronological viewpoint the mass migration of
refugees and the November 2016 U.S.
Presidential elections coincide (see reference to “Kingdoms given to men incapable of prudence”).
Could Nostradamus’ wording “Kingdoms given to men incapable
of prudence” refer to the political discourse relating to the 2016 Presidential
State primaries? Wow! What a noteworthy observation, especially coming
from a man who lived centuries ago!
Nostradamus sounds like Mitt Romney!
Haven’t many Republican politicians perceived Donald Trump
precisely as incapable of prudence? What about Hillary Clinton? Is she prudent and capable of running the
country and solving America ’s
most crucial problems – unemployment, job migration to other countries, and
income inequality? Her husband, Bill
Clinton, approved NAFTA, which was instrumental in the wholesale migration of America ’s
industries to other countries and he is deemed responsible for the current
demise of the American working class.
Hillary, until very recently, supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed agreement which would erode the
American job market even further. Do
NAFTA and TPP qualify Hillary Clinton to be the next President of the U.S. ,
and is her position prudent? I never
heard her criticize Bill Clinton’s NAFTA approval. In fact, she stated that she intends to
assign Bill Clinton with the task to resolve the country’s economic
problems. Does this mean she intends to
get rid of the remaining few jobs in this country?
The word “Then …” infers that the dissension and loss of
life would take place after the U.S.
Presidential elections. The
Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the word “dissension” as: Disagreement that
causes the people in a group to argue about something that is important to
them. This is an ominous
prediction. The fact that Nostradamus
included this event of death and dissension in his book of predictions infers
that this could be a rather serious event of street violence and death. Such an event could create spontaneous outbreaks
of civil unrest and violence, bring about chaos and social disorder around the
country, undermine the control of public institutions, adversely impact the
economy, and seriously impact America ’s
image around the world.
The latter part of the quatrain referring to dissension and
death may already be unfolding in front of our eyes, and it may have become
apparent during the 2016 Presidential State primaries. Look at the reaction of the American
electorate vis-à-vis the established politicians? Look at the enthusiastic reception Trump has
received! Look at the equally
enthusiastic support Senator Bernie Sanders has received! What does the people’s reaction tell us? Doesn’t it show anger and disgust for the political
establishment?
The results of the 2016 State primaries reflect a defining
moment, a complete revulsion to political cronyism and corruption. Does anyone think this awareness of political
injustice will stop with the final Presidential nominations? I don’t think so. The world economies are gradually but surely
deteriorating. All indications point to
a protracted economic secular stagnation with quarterly GDPs around 1%. The massive jobs migration from the U.S.
to other countries will, most likely, continue unabated. Private equity funds will continue to
increase in number and in asset allocations.
Income inequality between the very rich and the 99% of the population
will continue to increase. The national
deficit has already reached about $19.5 trillion. How much higher could it go without
triggering a massive inflation – especially if interest rates are raised and
the federal government’s portion to service the national debt increases to an
untenable level? At some point in time
people’s despair and anger will seek a violent release. In the near future we will find out if
Nostradamus’ prediction has fully materialized.
